The 40/60 model

The RCK Outcome Fee Model: 60% of our fee is released only against verified GL outcomes

Follow the incentive: commercial alignment dictates operational behaviour.

How a firm is paid dictates how it behaves. 40% is billed on time spent from kickoff. The remaining 60% is billed through rolling sprints and is not earned until the acceptance criteria are met in your General Ledger (GL — the accounting system of record).

40% billed on time spent · 60% released against verified GL outcomes

Compare 40/60 with billable-hour advisory

Comparison

Billable-hour advisory, PMI shops, and the RCK Outcome Fee Model

View the full table
Volume consultanciesPMI shopsRCK
How the fee is earnedHours deliveredDay rate per consultant40% on time spent; 60% against verified outcomes
Who is in the roomLeveraged junior pyramidContract associatesNamed partner, capped at three to four mandates
What ends the engagementBudget exhaustionEnd of placementAcceptance criteria met in the GL
Exposure if outcomes are missedNoneNone60% of the fee

PMI — post-merger integration.

Composition

How the fee is composed

40% is billed based on time spent, including mobilisation, partner input and the core operating cadence from kickoff. 60% is billed through a set of rolling sprints to ensure pace and performance against agreed outcomes.

Total contract valueFee composition
40%Billed on time spent
60%Released against outcomes
40% billed on time spent from kickoff.60% billed through rolling sprints against agreed outcomes.

Every outcome, whether a TSA (transitional services agreement) exit date, operating-model transition, synergy realisation, or target financial metric, is pegged to an objective baseline agreed during scoping. The 60% is not earned until those acceptance criteria are met.

Contract

How this looks in a contract

Figures below are illustrative and are not a quote.

  • Sample total contract value — £400,000 (illustrative).
  • What the 40% covers — named partner time, mobilisation, and the core operating cadence from kickoff.
  • Three example milestones — a TSA (transitional services agreement) exit date, a synergy line landed in the GL, and a Day-100 operating model.
  • Release rule — released per milestone, not all-or-nothing, so a met milestone is invoiced whether or not later ones land.
  • If acceptance criteria are unmet at engagement end — the unearned share of the 60% is not invoiced. It is unearned rather than deferred to a later date.

Verification

How an outcome actually gets verified

Step 1

Baselines and acceptance criteria, written before kickoff

Data source: the client’s GL and the last signed-off month-end close. Signed by: the client sponsor and the RCK engagement partner. If they disagree: the baseline is escalated to the programme board before work starts, not renegotiated later.

Step 2

Measurement against the source data

Data source: the GL, plus the operational system of record for non-financial milestones. Partial hit: a milestone met in part releases that proportion of its tranche — 80% of a synergy target releases 80% of that milestone’s share, not the whole tranche and not nothing.

Step 3

Client sponsor is the release gate

Signed by: the client sponsor, whose signature releases the matching share of the 60%. Where a mandate includes independent assurance, that assurance signs alongside the sponsor. Invoicing: within the month-end billing cycle following sign-off. If they disagree: the milestone stays unreleased and goes to the programme board.

What the model designs in

When remuneration is tied to defined outcomes, behaviour follows the incentive:

1

Execution velocity

With 60% of the fee unearned until criteria are met, delay erodes our own economics. Candidates are identified within 48 hours, and the partner or interim is in seat in Week 1.

2

Focus on high-impact levers

We deploy against the levers that move defined outcomes — accelerating a TSA exit, or landing EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation) in the GL — not non-value workstreams or status decks.

3

Radical transparency

On an input model, a firm bills through emerging failure. Here, if a hurdle threatens a milestone, our incentive is to surface it immediately and re-plan, not to bill quietly against a deteriorating timeline.

Proof: Across representative mandates, synergy capture landed between 42% and 91% of the targeted figure, measured in the client’s ledger. Full case studies: /case-studies

Questions

What buyers ask about the model

What if the client changes scope?
Acceptance criteria are re-cut with the sponsor and the affected milestones are re-priced before work continues. Criteria are never changed retrospectively to release a fee.
What if the deal pauses?
Time already spent is invoiced under the 40%. Sprint billing stops, and the unearned share of the 60% stays unearned until the mandate restarts and its criteria are met.
What if data access is late?
Late access moves the measurement date, not the criteria. Where a milestone cannot be measured because access was withheld, it goes to the programme board rather than lapsing silently.
Is the 60% lost or delayed?
If the acceptance criteria are met, it is invoiced. If they are not met by engagement end, the unearned share is simply not invoiced — it is unearned, not parked for later.
Who writes the acceptance criteria?
The client sponsor and the RCK engagement partner write them together before kickoff, and both sign them. Neither side can change them alone.

See your numbers

See exactly how much of our fee is at risk on your deal.

Worked example, illustrative: on a £400,000 mandate, £160,000 is billed on time spent from kickoff and £240,000 is at risk across three GL gates. Model your own in about a minute.